Sets are released as to maintain a good game balance. If you have feedback on any of the sets in question, this would be the place to post it.
I'm sorry, but what kind of balance are you talking about?!! You mean that, "Well we gave you good sets for 3 years, so heres 3 years of uselessness"?
By making far weaker sets, than we allready have, nothing will change, thats not how you keep balance.
I'm not saying that we have to have op sets each event, but something that we will want to use.
I have for example a full level 3 Captain's set, most of it on level 4 and people who have the Union set better than me 8,5/10 times. On defense 10/10 times
I play mainly for events, but last year was a disaster. You can't put so weak sets in the pool, who needs them? Not even new players (if they even exist) soon they have money, they'll switch to the better old ones.
Lets take Corita for example:
Not taking skills in consideration it gives you:
29.5 Defense and 190 Resistance
Its counter is the Union (which no one can get) gives:
21 Attack 170 Damage
Would say its balanced but you can't buy Union anymore and on level 1 its far better than Cortina could ever be.
There should be a other set similar to Cortina but with:
20 on defense but 250 Resistance so people could choose if they want the better skills or more resistance.
But obviously more Resistance is the go to. Thats just a basic example.
Those 2 sets are op Union more so, they should get a counter so it evens it out.
I'm not a fan of duells but the sets mixed with the now upgraded cloths is far more versatile. Barely see the same thing on people.
The set that gives you point for the Church is perfect, not much better but its greater, that's how you should improve always.
Sorry for bad England