Easter Event 2026 - Discussion

[Loki]

Howdy Cowboys and Cowgirls,


Feel free to post here any comments and/or questions regarding our Easter Event 2026.

---

Yours sincerely,

Loki​

Community Manager

 

[maniek]

Set 1. Too little tactics and too little HP. I was hoping for appearance instead of tactics. The weapon should be stronger.

 

[freedgess]

if the guarding bandit weapon set bonus got a shot,then why doesn't the zombie weapon set bonus get a impact force?

 

[Test acc]

For me the guarding and prisoner set, both are perfect, only the other 2, should have single job skill, not because its bad have more labor jobs on it, but because soon, will left no job to give a set, so these 2, would easily get something stronger, at least the free one, i doubt that will apear full set in any job, and also doubt that in a specific job will apear something better, withouth even the new free part of the set, like coroner... Josefa is for it, or foxes, Taylor is for It...

 

[Test acc]

For me the guarding and prisoner set, both are perfect, only the other 2, should have single job skill, not because its bad have more labor jobs on it, but because soon, will left no job to give a set, so these 2, would easily get something stronger, at least the free one, i doubt that will apear full set in any job, and also doubt that in a specific job will apear something better, withouth even the new free part of the set, like coroner... Josefa is for it, or foxes, Taylor is for It...

Actualy guarding and prisoner are perfect, not my opinion, prisiner is the sundance for defende, and guarding is the Sarah Astor 2.0, and the weapons are weaker than male only for dodging and tactics, (male weapon has no vigor and no shooting in the set bonus) so both sets keep the weapon as option, would be sad for male okto being worse than guarding, so it make sense cuz guarding has both vigor and shooting, like forty weapon, if you compare to endecott, you see that endecott weapon has more reflex, aiming, appearance, but has basically no damage, so both still a option.

And for the free one, would make way more sense if each part of set and the bonus, give labor points to all Jobs, in the end the free set cant be sold, upgraded and get it again, so why it is already useless?

And mossman is ok, cuz one of the skills is for a very old job, but still would be little better be a single work skill bonuses (is less options of sets in future, or they would need update sooner).

 

[maniek]

Guarding Bandit has been nerfed too much. It's now slightly better than Sarah Astor. And Sarah Astor isn't exactly a great set. Tactics or HP should be increased.

 

[nanolotekCWEL]

Guarding Bandit has been nerfed too much. It's now slightly better than Sarah Astor. And Sarah Astor isn't exactly a great set. Tactics or HP should be increased.

please if you cant play pvp just leave town and shut your mouth. its annoying

 

[Emma Swan]

Are you sure they want our feedback? if they want feedback, go read feedback thread. Why do they want feedback if from now on nothing will change?

I will just add this: Imagine spending 48 000 eggs for 4th round just to get chest that costs 500 UPD while the saddest price was up until not 1000 bonds. Please, make it make sense to us? 4th category is supposed to have the best from the best. Players will hesitate and most luckily avoind 4th category just with eggs, nobody with a brain will spend nuggets and be afraid of getting chest

Maybe one day they will get management that actually thinks, or get book about basic management and social skills, ironicaly this game is pretty easy to think through, so.... yeah..basic book the first one on the shelf will help... Sometimes, we get disappointed every time more and more, thats a real talent to manage that, you know that?

Please invest at least 5 minutes more per week to read community feedback thread for better understanding and results, okey?

 

[WesternCalin]

Ok, so last attempt to change anything. Regarding free set the Exp/Money bonuses are way too low compared to Colombian/Indep. The values i proposed dont even make this set better than these 2 but atleast they are close to it so it will not be entirely useless for new players since this 2 previous sets mentioned are becoming to be very cheap.
I'd suggest something like 70% Exp/70% Money for Clothes, 45% Exp/35% Money for Weapons, 45% Exp/40% Money for Mount. Clothes could have higher Exp than that as we have Geronimo free set at 110% so even 80% Exp sounds reasonable for new set.

For set 1 first of all the mount set has way to much HP. You should change the to have highest value in Dodge and lowest value as HP and Aiming. Clothes should still be nerfed a bit. The amount of skill points you get compared to Sarah Astor is way to high. IF you have that amount of dodge over a previous set atleast make it worse in another stat which should be Health Points. Make the value on Belt and Pants half of what is currently. This will reduce total HP at lvl 200 to 207 HP. Still a decent value and not so much power creep from previous set.

Set 2. Fix the values on Body and Pants. You get 100% Money instead of 36%. Set has 376% Money and 160% Luck at lvl 200. I would say knowing we just recently got Krampus the bonuses are way too high. 166% more money for 50% Luck is way too much. Maybe nerfing Money to 120% on the set bonus isnt a bad idea.

Set 3. You made the set exactly the same as Sundance and just a little bit better than Langdon when we all know that defence is barely struggling to survive battles due to the problems we mentioned time and time again. The buff from here won't help in any way. You need to add more Hit chance and Damage as sector bonus. I suggest something like +4 Sector Hit chance on Clothes and Weapons, +5 sector Hit chance on Mount.

 

[WesternCalin]

Another thing: day 150 atleast of asking to change the 2x Shooting bonuses on this item. Can you please fix the stuff you released in the first update with the new dev or we will never get that changed?
This also includes the Folklorico cat with 337% Speed instead of 375% Speed advertised in the changelog like Zombie mount, along with the Xocgiquetzal's Shield having 1.1 Damage instead of 1.15 from the changelog like the Spear.
Probably more things but this is what i remember for now.

 

[Uchiha Madara]

Year 6 of asking to remove the useless chests entirely from ANY event. No one wants them.

Add XP potion in Uncommon and you will get x10 revenue ( InnoGames are very poor on managing stuff like this I wonder does the actual HQ know that they can make shit tons of money if they add XP potions in every event? )

1k Bonds should not be in Very Rare same as the new chest, they are not of the same value as 48k eggs or 800 nuggets, the chest is worth 500 bonds or nuggets so being added in the Very Rare where you need to spend 800 nuggets doesnt make any sense at all! It should be maximum in Rare category.

Add reskill potion in rare category too. Very Rare category should ONLY include the new sets, nothing else and if you want you can make a new chest that gives previous set chests and add it in the Very Rare category but that chest should only include chests inside from past easter events not the chest we have now that does include chest but also parts of sets.

 

[Criminus]

Maybe because they don't want everyone to get to level 250 so quick. Maybe it was the last major update we had. Maybe they don't really care about the players anymore. It's a legacy title. They will keep it online even with 5 players.

 

[Shirohime]

Add XP potion in Uncommon and you will get x10 revenue ( InnoGames are very poor on managing stuff like this I wonder does the actual HQ know that they can make shit tons of money if they add XP potions in every event? )

Just adding to this in light of Innogames lacking any common sense when balancing stuff on their own without checking feedback properly.

IF they add XP potions to Uncommon or Rare, it should be 5/2/1% but not 10/25%, otherwise p2w players will get ahead too far too fast from f2p players
(just for clarification to those that lack any kind of reading comprehension, I'm p2w player lookin out for balance sake, it isn't too fun to be too high in level and no players to duel/compite against you)

Having said that, they really should remove those useless ass chests for the 101th time, heck move it to Common at least not Uncommon. And nobody asked for Saloon Friend Chest, it cost 500 bonds for pretty much useless clothes outside collection sake, it's not worth the Very Rare spot, move it to Rare or Uncommon.

 

[Emma Swan]

Our feedback is like watering flower bed before rain. Really pointless. Imagine how better set 1 would have been with almost no HP but higher tactics. Imagine how better set 3 would have been with +2 higher flat attack, +60 extra sector dmg, and + 0,15% leadership and setting traps. ANd imagine Winner set being with dueling stats during duel theme event, that you could have used for dueling, adventures, jobs and if you lazy church - 4 uses in 1 price.

I agree, they dont know their game and they hate players (the customers) each event more and more. Players know their game, but they dont go according to players feedback. They go with their own intuition. Then they go and randomly pick something from feedback, most of the time something that should be made differently. They feel like they made 3 times changes (little and unnecessary), so we are done now. So they have listened feedback, but have they? No, because they dont need feedback, they know better. So, why are they asking for feedback, if they dont even go there? Can somebody crack this for me?

 

[Test acc]

Our feedback is like watering flower bed before rain. Really pointless. Imagine how better set 1 would have been with almost no HP but higher tactics. Imagine how better set 3 would have been with +2 higher flat attack, +60 extra sector dmg, and + 0,15% leadership and setting traps. ANd imagine Winner set being with dueling stats during duel theme event, that you could have used for dueling, adventures, jobs and if you lazy church - 4 uses in 1 price.

I agree, they dont know their game and they hate players (the customers) each event more and more. Players know their game, but they dont go according to players feedback. They go with their own intuition. Then they go and randomly pick something from feedback, most of the time something that should be made differently. They feel like they made 3 times changes (little and unnecessary), so we are done now. So they have listened feedback, but have they? No, because they dont need feedback, they know better. So, why are they asking for feedback, if they dont even go there? Can somebody crack this for me?

Dont need.

 

[Spicer]

this in light of Innogames lacking any common sense when balancing stuff on their own without checking feedback properly.

IF they add XP potions to Uncommon or Rare, it should be 5/2/1% but not 10/25%, otherwise p2w players will get ahead too far too fast from f2p players
(just for clarification to those that lack any kind of reading comprehension, I'm p2w player lookin out for balance sake, it isn't too fun to be too high in level and no players to duel/compite against you)

Having said that, they really should remove those useless ass chests for the 101th time, heck move it to Common at least not Uncommon. And nobody asked for Saloon Friend Chest, it cost 500 bonds for pretty much useless clothes outside collection sake, it's not worth the Very Rare spot, move it to Rare or Uncommo

Wow we actually agree on something, I wish they'd remove those as well. Put in something better. Oh well

Our feedback is like watering flower bed before rain. Really pointless. Imagine how better set 1 would have been with almost no HP but higher tactics. Imagine how better set 3 would have been with +2 higher flat attack, +60 extra sector dmg, and + 0,15% leadership and setting traps. ANd imagine Winner set being with dueling stats during duel theme event, that you could have used for dueling, adventures, jobs and if you lazy church - 4 uses in 1 price.

I agree, they dont know their game and they hate players (the customers) each event more and more. Players know their game, but they dont go according to players feedback. They go with their own intuition. Then they go and randomly pick something from feedback, most of the time something that should be made differently. They feel like they made 3 times changes (little and unnecessary), so we are done now. So they have listened feedback, but have they? No, because they dont need feedback, they know better. So, why are they asking for feedback, if they dont even go there? Can somebody crack this for me?

this is really a failure to accept that feedback does NOT = I get every single change I request in proposed gear sets. The irony is this: If you had your own online game like this by your comments you've shown a robust propensity to do the very same things you're largely complaining about InnoGames doing. I didn't get everything I wanted and they actually reduced the set from what I had hoped. In the end your opinion is no more valid than anyone else's. Relax in the sunshine with that knowledge

 

[darkuletzz]

it was not 480 eggs before? and 8 nuggets :-?

 

[I AM INEVITABLE]

Sorry but the chest are the only thing i care about

Its not bad to have a little bit of everything. But the red chest on very rare shouldnt br there. Also keep the unique precious chest but remove the unique chest its useless for collection.

 

[F4SZ]

it was not 480 eggs before? and 8 nuggets :-?

the bribing

 

[Emma Swan]

Wow we actually agree on something, I wish they'd remove those as well. Put in something better. Oh well

this is really a failure to accept that feedback does NOT = I get every single change I request in proposed gear sets. The irony is this: If you had your own online game like this by your comments you've shown a robust propensity to do the very same things you're largely complaining about InnoGames doing. I didn't get everything I wanted and they actually reduced the set from what I had hoped. In the end your opinion is no more valid than anyone else's. Relax in the sunshine with that knowledge

Since I am a gardener I am probably more touching grass and enjoying Sun more than you, I dare to say. Just because we are consistant with giving feedback doesnt mean we are obsessed or addicted. Not even if we are trying to push it hard to get at least some little tweaking. It also doesnt need to be 100% according to mine or ours, or hers feedback, what we wanna see is them actually following logic, thats where we would like to get

Sorry but the chest are the only thing i care about

Its not bad to have a little bit of everything. But the red chest on very rare shouldnt br there. Also keep the unique precious chest but remove the unique chest its useless for collection.

Agreed, chests are fine unless they are not in wrong category, red is fine in 3rd category. I still dont understand why there is no XP potion....And since its dueling event, I would also add in 3rd category potion for duel level reset. And I would also add there reskill potion because some people do like them.